🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who see them each day.

After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities pays for the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something one caretaker observed first-hand.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a role that required earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with opposing natures.

“Eve selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a context of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the park links to natural mortality, but which activists say reflects the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and around the clock supervision than any individual in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was terminated from the facility in recent months following the demise of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility believed details of the incident were shared to the media and she was let go not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “considerable personnel”, trucks and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She supports demands for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official turned down a proposal to transfer the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing existence in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the official stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an transfer that would prolong the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a wider lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials attempt to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.

A planned sanctuary in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The future site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain positive that it could in time represent a long term answer for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Some experts say the idea of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the facility will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|